Table 5.

Comparison of GD prevalence rates between DSM-IV and DSM-5

Source of data: Investigator, date, and type of study	DSM-IV	DSM-5	Difference in prevalence
			Difference	z	p
(1) Stinchfield et al. (2012); Ontario; n = 422	205/422 = .486	215/422 = .509	.023	−.69	.49
(2) Stinchfield et al. (2012); Minnesota; n = 212	103/212 = .486	113/212 = .533	.047	−.97	.33
(3) Jimenez-Murcia et al. (2012); Spain n = 282	179/282 = .635	203/282 = .720	.085	−2.16	.03
(4) Jimenez-Murcia et al. (2009); Spain; n = 569	265/569 = .466	277/569 = .487	.021	−.71	.48
(5) Stinchfield et al. (2005); Minnesota; n = 135	87/130 = .669	89/130 = .685	.016	−.27	.79
(6) Stinchfield (2003); Minnesota; n = 175	144/175 = .823	147/175 = .840	.017	−.43	.67
(7) Stinchfield et al. (2005); Ontario; n = 390	104/390 = .267	116/390 = .297	.030	−.96	.34
(8) Stinchfield (2003); Minnesota; n = 1062	248/1059 = .234	256/1059 = .242	.008	−.41	.68