Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;14(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0971-9

Table 3.

Perioperative outcomes of RAPN versus OPN

Study (OPN/RAPN) OT (min) WIT (min) MBL (ml) Positive margins (%) HS (day) eGFR change (ml/min per 1.73 m2) Transfusion rate (%) Conversion rate (%)
Wu et al. [10] NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA 0 (0.0)/0 (0.0) NA/NA NA/NA 4 (4.3)/3 (5.9) 1 (1.1)/0 (0.0)
Vittori et al. [11] 123 ± 43/168 ± 56 18.7 ± 8.1/18.2 ± 7 230 ± 208/125 ± 128 11 (5.6)/6 (5.7) NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA 2 (1.0)/1 (0.9)
Masson-Lecomte et al. [16] 128.4 ± 50.5/134.8 ± 35.3 17.1 ± 5.9/17.5 ± 7.8 414.7 ± 367.5/142.9 ± 225.9 4 (6.9)/1 (2.4) 6.8 ± 3.5/3.8 ± 1.1 NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA
Ficarra et al. [17] NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA 9 (4.5)/9 (4.5) NA/NA −16.6 ± 18.1/−16.4 ± 22.9 20 (10.0)/21 (10.5) NA/NA
Kim et al. [24] 126.8 ± 42.7/196.9 ± 50.1 27.8 ± 9.7/31.3 ± 9.5 356.7 ± 269.2/296.8 ± 246.8 1 (1.2)/2 (3.0) 4.6 ± 2.1/2.9 ± 1.4 −0.49 ± 17.5/−2.54 ± 16.01 13 (15.7)/5 (7.5) 7 (8.4)/4 (5.9)
Lucas et al. [18] NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA 4 (7.4)/1 (3.7) NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA 0 (0.0)/1 (3.7)
Han et al. [6] 187.2 ± 43.8/162.3 ± 32.3 19.6 ± 6.7/24.7 ± 7.3 NA/NA NA/NA 7.3 ± 2.06/5.3 ± 1.41 −4.34 ± 8.34/−2.4 ± 6.7 NA/NA NA/NA
Oh et al. [19] 138.79 ± 40.29/182.89 ± 83.98 21.18 ± 11.29/21.86 ± 9.25 230.74 ± 159.33/212.04 ± 160.76 1 (1.0)/0 (0.0) 9.26 ± 3.22/5.41 ± 1.84 −6.19 ± 7.32/−7.53 ± 4.28 6 (6.0)/4 (4.0) NA/NA
Lee et al. [9] 142.77 ± 47.69/192.42 ± 78.05 18.14 ± 7.16/22.99 ± 8.43 216.50 ± 165.38/228.70 ± 182.89 6 (2.6)/0 (0.0) 8.90 ± 3.11/6.20 ± 1.99 −5.25 ± 10.01/−6.11 ± 9.14 NA/NA 1 (0.4)/1 (1.4)
Alemozaffar et al. [7] 238.3 ± 119.5/231.8 ± 44.2 NA/NA 275.4 ± 170.0/178.0 ± 205.7 NA/NA 4.60 ± 1.68/2.48 ± 0.68 NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA
Simhan et al. 1 2012 [12] 189.5 ± 52.0/205.9 ± 52.5 NA/NA 256.5 ± 291.3/131.3 ± 127.8 1 (0.7)/3 (3.7) 5.6 ± 3.9/3.7 ± 1.6 1.5 ± 21/−2.4 ± 23.1 NA/NA NA/NA
Simhan et al. 2 2012 [12] 197.5 ± 60.4/221.1 ± 72.5 NA/NA 330.6 ± 406.0/225.0 ± 304 3 (5.6)/0 (0.0) 6.1 ± 4.1/2.9 ± 1.4 6.1 ± 25.2/−9 ± 21.2 NA/NA NA/NA
Zargar et al. 1 2014 [20] 185.42 ± 5 6.4/174.9 ± 61.7 NA/NA NA/NA 3 (9.1)/2 (6.7) NA/NA NA/NA 5 (15.2)/6 (20.0) NA/NA
Zargar et al. 2 2014 [20] 244.1 ± 59.3/250.8 ± 66 23.9 ± 8.1/22.7 ± 5.8 NA/NA 4 (7.7)/1 (10.0) NA/NA NA/NA 8 (15.4)/0 (0.0) NA/NA
Boylu et al. [8] 152 ± 18/225 ± 58 18 ± 3.5/23 ± 7.3 417 ± 202/268 ± 303 0 (0.0)/1 (2.1) 5.4 ± 2/4.11 ± 1.5 NA/NA 2 (10.0)/5 (10.9) NA/NA
Mano et al. [22] 128 (108–156)/154 (113–177)b NA/NA 200 (100–413)/100 (25–200)b NA/NA 2.47 ± 1.31/1.51 ± 0.76 NA/NA NA/NA NA/NA
Miyake et al. [23] 203.7 ± 55.2/263.0 ± 63.5 20.3 ± 9.1/23.0 ± 7.5(1) 653.6 ± 611.7/57.5 ± 96.9 0 (0)/0 (0) 4.8 ± 0.8/4.2 ± 0.8 10.0 ± 6.6/10.4 ± 7.0 0 (0)/0 (0) 0 (0)/0 (0)
Webb et al. [21] NA/NA 30.69 ± 10.65a/28.01 ± 9.34 NA/NA 1 (4.8)/1 (7.1) 4 (3–6)b/3 (2–4)b NA/NA 0 (0)/0 (0) 2 (9.5)/0 (0)

The data of OT, WIT, MBL, HS, and eGFR change are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The positive margin, transfusion, and conversion are shown with the number of cases and its percentage (the value in brackets) in each study

RAPN robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, OPN open partial nephrectomy; OT operating time; WIT warm ischemia time, MBL mean blood loss, HS hospital stay, eGFR change change of glomerular filtration rate, NA not available

aCold ischemia

bMedian (25th–75th)