Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;14(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0521-8

Table 3.

Estimated associations of K6 score changes based on caregiving duration (using sample subset 2)a

Dependent variable: change in K6 score from pre-caregiving commencement Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
β (SE) β (SE) β (SE)
Women (N. of observations (individuals) = 4637 (1.922))
Duration years from caregiving commencement (A) 0.11** (0.04) 0.23*** (0.05) 0.19*** (0.05)
  × Participated in social activities (B) −0.15*** (0.04)
  [− (B)/(A) %] [65.6*** (13.7]]
  × Participated in social activities prior to caregiving commencement (C) −0.11* (0.04)
  [− (C)/(A) %] [56.8 ** (18.2)]
K6 score at caregiving commencement −0.32*** (0.01) −0.33*** (0.01) −0.33*** (0.01)
Men (N. of observations (individuals) = 2700 (1242))
Duration years from caregiving commencement (A) 0.05 (0.05) 0.20** (0.06) 0.19** (0.07)
  × Participated in social activities (B) −0.18*** (0.05)
  [− (B)/(A) %] [89.6*** (23.9)]
  × Participated in social activities prior to caregiving commencement (C) −0.18** (0.06)
  [− (C)/(A) %] [95.3*** (27.4)]
K6 score at caregiving commencement −0.34*** (0.02) −0.34*** (0.02) −0.34*** (0.02)

aControlled for age at the first wave (2005), educational attainment, marital status, household spending (adjusted for household size), employed, number of care recipients, hours of care, residing with a care recipient, and waves. The full results are available upon request

***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05