Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2016 May 5;111(513):107–117. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1123157

Table 3.

Simulation results for the measurement error setting in which the full and reduced models are h−1 {pr(D = 1)} = β0 + βZZ and h−1 {pr(D = 1)} = θ0 + θXX, respectively, and where h−1 denotes the inverse link function corresponding to a logistic model. Results presented are multiplied by 103, and the coverage probability (CP) is in percents.

Int β0
GR/mGR
CML Int βZ
GR/mGR
CML
simple random; N = 1000
Bias −2.12 −3.73 0.20 0.80 1.23 1.13
SE 87.7 25.1 15.1 89.6 84.7 40.1
ESE 87.1 23.9 15.2 86.3 82.5 38.7
MSE 7.69 0.64 0.23 8.02 7.17 1.61
CP 95.9 92.6 94.1 94.2 94.0 94.1
case-control; N = 1000
Bias - - 0.99 2.85 2.91 1.74
SE - - 12.8 66.0 62.5 37.6
ESE - - 12.9 66.6 63.8 36.3
MSE - - 0.16 4.36 3.63 1.42
CP - - 95.6 95.7 96.1 94.6

Int: internal-data only method

GR: generalized regression, mGR: modified GR for case-control sampling

CML: constrained maximum likelihood

ESE: estimated standard error

MSE: mean squared error

CP: coverage probability of a 95% confidence interval interval