Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2016 May 5;111(513):107–117. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1123157

Table 4.

Simulation results for the missing covariate setting as in the caption for Table 2, but when the covariate distributions are different between the internal and external populations. Results multiplied by 103 are presented, and the coverage probabilities (CP) are reported as percents.

Int β0
CML
SCML Int βX
CML
SCML Int βZ
CML
SCML Int βXZ
CML
SCML
simple random; N = Nr = 1000
Bias −8.61 −32.4 −1.67 4.33 −85.2 2.63 1.10 0.30 −0.69 1.38 4.41 −0.04
SE 91.9 32.2 27.6 96.8 38.4 30.7 97.9 97.9 96.8 89.3 89.5 88.0
ESE 91.8 33.5 26.2 92.5 39.2 30.1 92.5 92.5 91.0 85.9 85.2 85.6
MSE 8.51 2.09 0.76 9.39 8.72 0.95 9.58 9.58 9.36 7,97 8.03 7.74
CP 95.3 90.6 92.0 93.5 42.3 93.0 93.2 93.3 93.4 93.5 93.6 93.9
case-control; N = Nr = 1000
Bias - −27.0 −1.13 0.76 −89.0 0.58 2.74 4.15 1.94 4.03 −1.90 2.30
SE - 23.6 23.1 71.4 27.1 26.8 74.1 74.1 73.6 73.7 73.5 72.7
ESE - 23.2 23.1 73.3 27.9 27.4 73.3 72.7 72.5 71.6 69.8 71.2
MSE - 1.29 0.53 5.09 8.65 0.72 5.50 5.51 5.42 5.45 5.40 5.29
CP - 82.0 94.2 95.0 7.9 93.7 94.3 94.0 94.1 93.6 93.5 94.3

Int: internal-data only method

CML: constrained maximum likelihood method

SCML: synthetic constrained maximum likelihood method

ESE: estimated standard error

MSE: mean squared error

CP: coverage probability of a 95% confidence interval