Table 2. Area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) graph comparing the accuracy of the PwD, BED, and LAg assays in identifying HIV infection recency.
Assay | AUC | SE | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
130-day cut-off | |||
PWD | 0.83 | 0.03 | 0.78–0.88 |
BED | 0.78 | 0.02 | 0.74–0.82 |
LAg | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.78–0.85 |
180-day cut-off | |||
PWD | 0.82 | 0.03 | 0.76–0.88 |
BED | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.71–0.79 |
LAg | 0.79 | 0.02 | 0.75–0.82 |
360-day cut-off | |||
PWD | 0.78 | 0.05 | 0.68–0.89 |
BED | 0.74 | 0.03 | 0.69–0.79 |
LAg | 0.72 | 0.02 | 0.68–0.77 |
The table shows the results for the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) graph. The AUC is an objective measure of the accuracy of a classification schema. The best possible value is 1.0, which represents a 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity of the assay to correctly distinguish recent from established HIV infections. The results show that the PwD assay has the best predictive performance for the three window periods. CI: confidence interval.