Table 2. Comparison of days of anthesis under different photoperiod conditions.
| Genotypea | Anthesis(DAS)b | Number of rosette leavesc | Number of cauline leavesd | Number of plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LD condition | ||||
| Col-0 | 28.53±1.125 | 8.93±1.387 | 3.67±0.488 | 19 |
| 35S::GhFT | 24.94±0.826** | 5.42±2.020** | 7.86±2.958** | 41 |
| SD condition | ||||
| Col-0 | 47.12±4.372 | 23.65±4.867 | 4.06±0.622 | 17 |
| 35S::GhFT | 29.59±2.062** | 5.59±2.175** | 6.86±2.031** | 35 |
| LD condition | ||||
| Col-0 | 34.00±2.03 | 12.80±1.77 | 3.30±0.57 | 20 |
| 35S::GhPEBP2-2 | 36.53±2.69** | 13.53±2.53 | 3.07±0.70 | 15 |
| 35S::GhPEBP2-3 | 35.48±2.35** | 12.46±1.32 | 2.96±0.81 | 24 |
| 35S::GhPEBP2-5 | 31.54±1.48** | 9.46±1.45** | 2.39±0.74** | 28 |
a Genetic background: Col, Columbia; transgenic lines of GhFT under different photoperiod conditions.
b Indicators of anthesis (days after sowing (DAS)), shown as average ± standard deviation (SD)
c,d Indicators of leaf numbers, shown as average ± SD. Plants were grown under long days (16 h/8 h photoperiod) and short days (8 h/16 h photoperiod).
** Values significantly different from Col-0 at p < 0.01.