Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 9;2(4):262–269. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.002907

Table 6. Sensitivity analysis: cost-effectiveness of the intervention from an NHS/PSS perspective, excluding non-primary-care-/non-intervention-related costs, on imputed data.

Usual care mean Intervention mean Difference (95% CI)
Costs and QALYs
 Total NHS/PSS costs £488 £623 £135 (£70 to £199)
 QALYs 0.540 0.541 0.001 (−0.023 to 0.026)
Cost-effectiveness statistics
 ICER: £114 624
 Probability that intervention cost-effective at CE threshold of £20 000: 0.33
 Probability that intervention cost-effective at CE threshold of £30 000: 0.40
 NMB at threshold of £20 000 (95% confidence interval): −£111 (−£132 to −91)

CI, confidence interval; PSS, personal social services; QALYs, quality-adjusted life years; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; CE, cost-effectiveness; NMB, net monetary benefit.

We report confidence intervals for the point estimate of net benefit, but not for the ICER. Confidence intervals for the ICER can be both difficult to interpret34 and statistically intractable.33 Instead, we place an emphasis throughout our analysis on net benefit. We present cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and confidence intervals around net benefit to represent uncertainty in our cost-effectiveness results.