Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;40(4):326–333. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2016.40.4.326

Fig. 4. Comparison of performance for extraction conditions: (A) change in glucose permeability and (B) that of minimally invasive interstitial fluid extraction technology (MIET) performance compared with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in repetitive measurements. Results are shown as the mean±standard deviation. AUC, area under the curve.

Fig. 4