Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 24;7:1181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01181

Table 4.

Goodness of fit statistics for models.

# Model df χ2 RMSEA 90% CI CFI TLI α NR α NC α W α
ORIGINAL MASYC (12 ITEMS)
1 Univariate 54 212.69 0.100 0.086–0.114 0.898 0.876 0.80
2 3-factor 51 92.32 0.052 0.035–0.069 0.973 0.966 0.69 0.66 0.67
NEW FULL SCALE (17 ITEMS)
3 Univariate 119 355.86 0.082 0.072–0.092 0.914 0.901 0.87
4 3-factor (item 11 on NR) 116 180.57 0.043 0.031–0.055 0.977 0.972 0.78 0.66 0.81
NEW FULL SCALE WITH MISUNDERSTOOD AND MATH PROBLEM ITEMS REMOVED (MASYC-R; 13 ITEMS)
5 Univariate 65 255.76 0.100 0.087–0.113 0.916 0.899 0.87
6a 3-factor (item 11 on NR) 62 98.16 0.044 0.027–0.060 0.984 0.980 0.76 0.75 0.80
7 2-factor (NR and W combined) 64 106.78 0.048 0.031–0.063 0.981 0.977 0.86 0.75

df, degrees of freedom; χ2, chi-square statistic; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; 90% CI, 90% confidence interval around the RMSEA; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; α, Cronbach's alpha; NR, Negative Reactions; NC, Numerical Confidence; W, Worry

a

Model 6 was identified as the final model.