Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Vet J. 2015 Aug 13;207:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.014

Table 1.

Velocity and a relative velocity ranges used for this study.

Velocity range (m/s) Source b Efficiency of trial capture (%) Withers height relative velocity range Shoulder height relative velocity range
1.3 – 1.9 Malek et al., 2012. 45.5 ± 32.5
1.3 – 2.1 Fahie et al., 2013 75.9 ± 26.6 0.55 – 0.93 0.65 – 1.05
1.5 – 2.0 Rumph et al., 1993 63.4 ± 31.5 0.6 – 0.9 0.7 – 1.0
1.5 – 2.2 Hans et al., 2014 84.2 ± 21.5 0.6 – 0.95 0.7 – 1.1
1.5 – 2.5 Borer et al., 2003 94.5 ± 10.7 0.6 – 1.05 0.7 – 1.2
1.6 – 1.9 Brown et al., 2013 39.3 ± 27.9
1.7 – 2.1 Havig et al., 2007 62.4 ± 24.0 0.7 – 0.93 0.8 – 1.05
1.8 – 2.2 Hans et al., 2014 60.8 ± 21.7 0.73 – 0.95 0.83 – 1.1
1.8 – 2.8 Lopez et al., 2006 74.6 ± 24.1 0.73 – 1.15 0.83 – 1.3
1.85 – 2.15 Voss et al., 2008 47.4 ± 20.9
1.9 – 2.2 Railland et al., 2012 41.9 ± 22.6
2.0 – 2.5 Ballagas et al., 2004 33.8 ± 27.9
a

Relative velocity V* = V/(g*H)1/2, where V is the velocity (m/s), g is the gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s2), and H represents withers or shoulder height (m)

b

Efficiency of trial capture (%) as reported by Hans et al. 2014. Data represent mean ± standard deviation.