Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1764-z

Table 5.

Demographics, exposure history, clinical manifestations, and risk factor analysis of hospitalized febrile patients with brucellosis, compared with non-brucellosis cases, at the Nork Hospital, 2010–2012

Feature Brucellosis cases, n (%) Non-brucellosis cases, n (%) OR (95 % CI) p-value
Demographic
 Age group (years) 0.449
  18–27 19 (38) 245 (45)
  28–37 10 (20) 124 (23)
  38–47 9 (18) 53 (10)
  48–57 6 (12) 64 (12)
  ≥58 6 (12) 63 (12)
 Gender
  Male 41 (84) 260 (47) 5.4 (2.5–11.8) < 0.001
  Female 8 (16) 276 (50) Reference
 Exposure history
  Consumption of raw or unpasteurized milk 37 (76) 12 (3) 41.6 (806–201.5) < 0.001
  Exposure to animals 20 (39) 8 (1.5) 45.2 (18.4–110.9) < 0.001
  Engagement in agricultural activity 20 (41) 9 (1.6) 15.0 (4.0–55.7) < 0.001
  Involvement in the slaughter of animals 11 (22) 6 (1) 13.0 (2.8–64.2) < 0.001
  Contact with animal abortus materials 12 (24) 0 (0) N/A N/A
 Clinical symptoms
  Excessive sweating 45 (90) 113 (21) 33.8 (13.1–87.1) < 0.001
  Joint pain 34 (68) 31 (6) 35.6 (17.7–71.4) < 0.001
  Muscle soreness 17 (34) 59 (11) 4.3 (2.2–8.1) < 0.001

Note: Denominators may vary due to missing data. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval. Out of those who reported having contact with animals, 15 (79 %) had contact with cattle and 4 (21 %) had contact with sheep. Sixty-one percent of the brucellosis patients did not report any contact with animals