Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;113(33):9177–9181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606562113

Fig. S4.

Fig. S4.

(A) Comparison between the B1g charge nematic susceptibility of FeSe and Co doped BaFe2 As2 (23) plotted as a function of T–T0 where T0 is the Curie–Weiss temperature of each sample. The arrows indicate the structural transition TS for each sample. (B) Electron–lattice coupling energy TST0 as a function of TS for FeSe and Co-Ba122.