Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;113(33):9177–9181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606562113

Fig. S6.

Fig. S6.

(A) Low energy fits of the B1g response of sample MK at 2.33 eV (532nm) using Eq. S5. (B) Temperature dependences of the inverse of the two contributions to the nematic susceptibility, A1 and A2 (red triangles; same as in Fig. 4). The dashed line is a linear fit of A11 between TS and 150K. It crosses the x axis at T*=11K. (C) Temperature dependence of the line width Γ of the QEP. The dashed line is a linear fit between TS and 150K. It crosses the x axis at T=66K.