Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;63(6):754–762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw378

Table 2.

Summary of Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoints (Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)

Endpoint Patients, No. (%)
Difference, % (95% CI)
Ceftazidime-Avibactam (n = 393) Doripenem (n = 417)
FDA co-primary endpoints
 Patient-assessed symptomatic resolutiona at day 5b 276 (70.2) 276 (66.2) 4.0 (−2.39 to 10.42)
 Combined patient-assessed symptomatic resolutionc and favorable per-patient microbiological response at TOCb 280 (71.2) 269 (64.5) 6.7 (.30 to 13.12)
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at TOC 304 (77.4) 296 (71.0) 6.4 (.33 to 12.36)
  Patient-reported symptomatic resolution at TOC 332 (84.5) 360 (86.3) −1.9 (−6.78 to 3.02)
EMA primary endpoint
 Per-patient favorable microbiological response at TOCd 304 (77.4) 296 (71.0) 6.4 (.33 to 12.36)
Secondary endpoints
 Microbiological
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at EOT (IV) 374 (95.2) 395 (94.7) 0.4 (−2.7 to 3.56)
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at LFU 268 (68.2) 254 (60.9) 7.3 (.68 to 13.81)
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at TOC in patients with a ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogene 47/75 (62.7) 51/84f (60.7) 2.0 (−13.18 to 16.89)
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at LFU in patients with a ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogene 46/75 (61.3) 38/84 (45.2) 16.1 (.50 to 30.89)
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at TOC in patients with a ceftazidime-susceptible pathogene 256/316 (81.0) 238/326 (73.0) 8.0 (1.50 to 14.48)
  Per-patient favorable microbiological response at LFU in patients with a ceftazidime-susceptible pathogene 221/316 (69.9) 209/326 (64.1) 5.8 (−1.46 to 13.05)
Clinical
  Investigator-determined clinical cure
   EOT (IV) 378 (96.2) 407 (97.6) −1.4 (−4.07 to 1.02)
   TOC 355 (90.3) 377 (90.4) −0.1 (−4.23 to 4.03)
   LFU 335 (85.2) 350 (83.9) 1.3 (−3.71 to 6.30)
  Sustained clinical cure at LFU in patients who were cured at TOC 330/355 (93.0) 345/377 (91.5) 1.4 (−2.5 to 5.4)
  Investigator-determined clinical cure at TOC in patients with a ceftazidime-susceptible pathogene 287/316 (90.8) 295/326 (90.5) 0.3 (−4.3 to 4.9)
  Investigator-determined clinical cure at TOC in patients with a ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogene 67/75 (89.3) 75/84f (89.3) 0.0 (−10.4 to 10.1)

Denominators are the total numbers in each group unless shown otherwise.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EMA, European Medicines Agency; EOT (IV), end of intravenous therapy; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; LFU, late follow--up (45–52 days after randomization); TOC, test of cure (21–25 days after randomization).

a Symptomatic resolution of symptoms of frequency, urgency, dysuria, and suprapubic pain with resolution or improvement in flank pain, based on the patient-reported symptom assessment questionnaire (PSAQ).

b Co-primary endpoints for the FDA. The sponsor concluded noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI at TOC was greater than −12.5%. The FDA noninferiority margin was a lower limit of the 95% CI greater than −10.0%.

c Symptomatic resolution of all symptoms (frequency, urgency, dysuria, suprapubic pain, and flank pain) based on the PSAQ.

d Primary endpoint for the EMA. The sponsor concluded noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI at TOC was greater than −12.5%.

e Ceftazidime nonsusceptibility was defined as a central microbiology reference laboratory minimum inhibitory concentration ≥8 µg/mL for Enterobacteriaceae or ≥16 µg/mL for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or local laboratory disk diffusion diameter (from a 30 μg ceftazidime disk) of ≤20 mm for Enterobacteriaceae and ≤17 mm for P. aeruginosa. Nine patients were not included in either subset (ceftazidime-nonsusceptible or ceftazidime-susceptible) because no susceptibility tests were performed (6 patients) or baseline blood or urine susceptibility results were missing (3 bacteremic patients).

f One patient in the doripenem group had 2 ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogens isolated at baseline.