Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 16;11:1873–1880. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S109121

Table 4.

Inhaler preference outcomes from using the COPD Device Preference Questionnaire in the two Phase IIIa active comparator studies (113360/113374; ITT population)

Patients receiving active Ellipta™ N=1,274* Patients receiving active HandiHaler® N=418 All patients N=1,692
Number of steps, n (%)
n 1,228 404 1,632
Ellipta™ 714 (58) 255 (63) 969 (59)
HandiHaler® 211 (17) 65 (16) 276 (17)
No preference 303 (25) 84 (21) 387 (24)
Time needed to use, n (%)
n 1,228 404 1,632
Ellipta™ 749 (61) 268 (66) 1,017 (62)
HandiHaler® 181 (15) 44 (11) 225 (14)
No preference 298 (24) 92 (23) 390 (24)
Ease of use, n (%)
n 1,228 404 1,632
Ellipta™ 760 (62) 260 (64) 1,020 (63)
HandiHaler® 199 (16) 52 (13) 251 (15)
No preference 269 (22) 92 (23) 361 (22)

Notes: N is the number of patients in the total population; n is the number of patients with analyzable data at the current time point.

*

This group includes patients receiving UMEC/VI, UMEC, or VI.

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ITT, intent-to-treat; UMEC/VI, umeclidinium/vilanterol; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.