Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan 14;57(4):653–659. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169235

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Schemes

Level Proposed scheme Fryback and Thornbury scheme
1 In vitro characterization Technical efficacy
 Kon, Koff, Kd, Bmax, and IC50
 Partition coefficient and binding potential
 Labeling efficiency and yield
 In vitro label stability
2 In vivo animal studies Diagnostic accuracy
 In vivo stability
 Target vs. nontarget tissue specificity
 Pharmacokinetics
 Radiochemistry optimization
 Dosimetry and toxicity
3 Initial human studies Diagnostic thinking
 Safety, dosimetry, and target specificity
 Tracer stability in vivo
 Pharmacokinetics (including metabolites)
 Reproducibility
 Determination of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV IND application
 Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls development
4 Impact on clinical care (change in management) Therapeutic efficacy
 Diagnosis (patients with suspicion of disease)
 Staging (patients with known disease)
 Response to therapy (imaging before and after therapy)
 Evaluation for targeted therapy
 Current-good-manufacturing-practices implementation
5 Impact on patient outcome Patient outcomes
 Assessment of implementation of change in management
 Assessment of correctness of change in management
 Survival with and without test (Kaplan–Meier plots)
 Quality-adjusted life years
6 Societal efficacy Societal efficacy
 Cost-benefit analysis
 Risk-benefit analysis
 Postapproval monitoring for side effects

Kon = binding rate constant; Koff = release rate constant; Kd = dissociation constant; Bmax = maximum number of binding sites; IC50 = inhibitory concentration of 50%; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.