Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0160226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160226

Table 3. The correlation coefficient between rim area and cpRNFLT.

Reference plane height All FI MY SS GE
60 μm 0.525 0.425 0.400 0.439 0.805
(P < 0.001) (P = 0.024) (P = 0.001) (P = 0.002) (P < 0.001)
90 μm 0.575 0.453 0.483 0.513 0.793
(P < 0.001) (P = 0.016) (P = 0.001) (P = 0.002) (P < 0.001)
120 μm 0.625 0.511 0.566 0.547 0.776
(P < 0.001) (P = 0.006) (P = 0.001) (P = 0.002) (P < 0.001)
150 μm 0.622 0.505 0.575 0.549 0.780
(P < 0.001) (P = 0.006) (P = 0.007) (P = 0.004) (P < 0.001)
180 μm 0.595 0.470 0.572 0.551 0.707
(P < 0.001) (P = 0.012) (P = 0.028) (P = 0.017) (P < 0.001)

The correlation coefficient between rim area and cpRNFLT at different reference plane heights and with different disc types. (Pearson’s product/moment correlation coefficient) The highest correlations were found at a height of 120 μm in the FI group (r = 0.511, P = 0.006), 150 μm in the MY group (r = 0.575, P = 0.007), 180 μm in the SS group (r = 0.551, P = 0.017), and 60 μm in the GE group (r = 0.805, P < 0.001).