Table 5. List of SS-OCT measurement parameters and their reproducibility.
| Parameter (20 patients) | Inter-rater ICC | Intra-rater ICC |
|---|---|---|
| Disc Area | 0.95 | 0.98 |
| Cup Area | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Rim Area | 0.92 | 0.97 |
| Disc Dia (V) | 0.91 | 0.94 |
| Disc Dia (H) | 0.91 | 0.94 |
| C/D Ratio (V) | 0.91 | 0.95 |
| C/D Ratio (H) | 0.91 | 0.96 |
| C/D Ratio (Area) | 0.95 | 0.99 |
| R/D Ratio (Area) | 0.95 | 0.99 |
| Max Cup Depth | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Avg Cup Depth | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| R/D Avg (SecT) | 0.93 | 0.96 |
| R/D Avg (SecTS) | 0.91 | 0.97 |
| R/D Avg (SecNS) | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| R/D Avg (SecN) | 0.94 | 0.96 |
| R/D Avg (SecNI) | 0.89 | 0.93 |
| R/D Avg (SecTI) | 0.92 | 0.95 |
| Rim Decentering Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 |
| Disc Angle (H) | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| Disc Height Difference | 0.78 | 0.92 |
Two testers marked the BMO points and ILM in 20 patients selected at random. Morphological parameters were quantified and their reproducibility was assessed, both for intra-rater (i.e., between the two testers) and inter-rater (i.e., between two ratings of the same tester) reliability. All parameters had an ICC > 0.7.