Table 5. Coefficients for correlations between habitat specialists’ rankings of examples of different habitats and algorithmic rankings.
Metric | D1 | D1.2 | D2 | E1 | E2 | E3 | F4 | F4.1 | F4.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Correlation coefficient (Kendall’s Tau) | |||||||||
SR | 0.29ns | 0.21ns | 0.06ns | 0.52* | 0.50* | 0.81*** | 0.25ns | 0.80*** | 0.60** |
SimpsonD | 0.39ns | 0.02ns | 0.08ns | 0.47* | 0.48* | 0.46* | 0.18ns | 0.54* | 0.17* |
Scarcity | 0.38ns | 0.08ns | 0.03ns | 0.27ns | 0.02ns | 0.37ns | 0.25ns | 0.06ns | 0.02ns |
Positive | 0.85*** | 0.09ns | −0.40ns | 0.72*** | 0.81*** | 0.85*** | 0.61** | 0.78*** | 0.52* |
Negative | 0.13ns | −0.25ns | −0.13ns | −0.18ns | 0.32ns | −0.12ns | −0.10ns | −0.35ns | −0.36ns |
Pos—Neg | 0.84*** | 0.04ns | −0.46* | 0.74*** | 0.66** | 0.74*** | 0.34ns | 0.67** | 0.55* |
Subshrub | 0.12ns | 0.29ns | 0.39ns | ||||||
Forb/Tot | 0.02ns | 0.39ns | 0.15ns | ||||||
Sphagnum | 0.53* | 0.62* | 0.52* | ||||||
MaxSimil | 0.58** | 0.43ns | 0.29ns | 0.63** | 0.48* | 0.12ns | 0.54* | 0.64** | 0.08ns |
MeanSimil | 0.42ns | 0.71** | 0.29ns | 0.53* | 0.61** | 0.58** | 0.30ns | 0.63** | 0.30ns |
Infertility | 0.49* | 0.25ns | 0.11ns | 0.47* | 0.73*** | 0.36ns | 0.63** | 0.57* | −0.05ns |
SR, Species-richness; SimpsonD, Simpson’s Diversity Index; Scarcity, (−1 × UK prevalence of least-prevalent species present); Positive, number of positive indicator-species; Negative, −1 × number of negative indicator-species; Pos − Neg, number of positive indicator-species minus number of negative indicator-species; MaxSimil, greatest Czekanowski similarity to corresponding National Vegetation Classification (NVC) subcommunities; MeanSimil, mean Czekanowski similarity to corresponding NVC subcommunities; Infertility, −1 × mean Ellenberg N score; ns, not significant
*, P < 0.05
**, P < 0.01
***, P < 0.001; blank cells, not applicable.