Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Radiat Oncol. 2015 Nov 3;5(1):55–61. doi: 10.1007/s13566-015-0230-7

Table 1.

Each expert's contoured GTV, pre-operative CTV and post-operative CTV sensitivity and specificity compared to the “ground truth” target volume generated by the STAPLE algorithm

Case 1- Stage III Thymoma preop/definitive Case 1-Stage III Thymoma postop/adjuvant

Expert GTV-sensitivity GTV-specificity CTV-sensitivity CTV-specificity CTV-sensitivity CTV-specificity
#1 0.84 >0.99 0.75 >0.99 0.70 >0.99
#2 0.95 >0.99 0.89 >0.99 0.40 >0.99
#3 0.81 >0.99 0.72 >0.99 0.43 >0.99
#4 0.68 >0.99 0.76 >0.99 0.61 >0.99
#5 0.68 >0.99 0.79 >0.99 0.44 >0.99
#6 0.76 >0.99 0.88 >0.99 0.63 >0.99
#7 0.66 >0.99 0.82 >0.99 0.63 >0.99
Mean±SD 0.77±0.10 >0.99 0.80±0.07 >0.99 0.55±0.12 >0.99

GTV = gross tumor volume, CTV = clinical target volume. Staging as per the Masaoka-Koga staging system. Sensitivity and specificity values for each expert contour Warfield's simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm to generate a composite segmentation estimate of a “ground truth” target volume, which was then compared to each individual experts contours.