Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Dec;169(12):1112–1116. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2831

Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis; logistic regression of maternal insulin and glucose levels in subcategories of congenital heart disease for subjects with random glucose less than 200 mg/dL

ToF vs. Controls
Model 1 1 Model 2 1
Analyte Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95%CI) 2 Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95%CI) 2
Log2(glucose) 2.93 (0.96, 8.96) 2.76 (0.87, 8.74) 5.45 (1.41, 21.08) 4.61 (1.14, 18.67)
Log2(Insulin) 0.93 (0.73, 1.18) 0.95 (0.75, 1.22) 0.78 (0.59, 1.03) 0.82 (0.61, 1.09)
dTGA vs. Controls
Model 1 Model 2
Analyte Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95%CI)1 Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95%CI)1
Log2(glucose) 0.41 (0.10, 1.60) 0.41 (0.10, 1.66) 0.72 (0.16, 3.33) 0.68 (0.15, 3.12)
Log2(Insulin) 0.74 (0.55, 0.99) 0.75 (0.56, 1.01) 0.76 (0.55, 1.05) 0.78 (0.56, 1.08)
1

Model 1 shows results for glucose or insulin alone. Model 2 shows results with both analytes simultaneously evaluated

2

For all subjects, adjusting for maternal race/ethnicity (Hispanic, and White non-Hispanic) and maternal age at sample collection (continuous, in years).