Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2016 Sep;20(9):1928–1936. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1377-y

Table 2.

Intervention versus standard-of-care over time for the proportion of sex acts that were high risk and the number of high risk sex acts

Outcome
measure
HIV negative
HIV positive
Time effect within
condition
Time 0 vs. Time 2
Time effect between conditions
Time 0 Time 1 Time 2 Time 0 Time 1 Time 2
Proportion of sex acts that were high riska At time 1: adjOR 0.86, 95 % CI
(0.41–1.76), p = 0.67
At time 2: adjOR 0.41, 95 % CI
(0.20–0.84), p = 0.015
    Intervention 73.74 % 49.51 % 38.28 % 83.89 % 64.53 % 53.51 % adjOR 0.22, 95 % CI
(0.13–0.37), p < 0.001
    Standard-
    of-care
72.41 % 51.76 % 58.40 % 82.97 % 66.56 % 72.26 % adjOR 0.49, 95 % CI
(0.30–0.79), p = 0.004
Mean number of high risk sex acts per persona,b At time 1: adjIRR 0.89, 95 % CI
(0.64–1.27), p = 0.53
At time 2: adjIRR 0.59, 95 %
CI (0.42–0.85), p = 0.004
    Intervention 17.79 10.93 9.34 14.29 8.78 7.51 adjIRR 0.52, 95 % CI
(0.40–0.69), p < 0.001
    Standard-
    of-care
15.61 10.68 13.69 12.54 8.58 11.00 adjIRR 0.87, 95 % CI
(0.69–1.10), p = 0.254

Data are shown separately for HIV negative and HIV positive participants for illustrative purposes, however, HIV results did not modify the intervention effect. In this sample sex acts refer to vaginal sexual intercourse. High risk sex acts refer to unprotected sex with partners of unknown or HIV serodiscordant status. Time points separated by an average of 3.2 months

IRR incident rate ratio, OR odds ratio, adj adjusted

a

Calculated from model-based estimates accounting for all other variables in the model

b

Mean number of high risk sex acts per person during the prior 3 months