Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 27;30(9):869–876. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0371-2

Table 4.

Associations with the number of deaths

Variable Test p value (adjusted)a Effect measure: estimate (95 % CI)
Hypoxia: yes/no E. Pearson’s Chi-squared test 1.00 Odds ratiob: 0.56 (0.15–2.08)
Responder: yes/no E. Pearson’s Chi-squared test 1.00 Odds ratio: 2.15 (0.58–8.00)
Median infusion rate ≥2 mg/kg/h: yes/no E. Pearson’s Chi-squared test 1.00 Odds ratio: 0.73 (0.21–2.56)
Loading dose administered: yes/no E. Pearson’s Chi-squared test 1.00 Odds ratio: 0.16 (0.02–1.45)
Number of previously failed AEDs Brunner-Munzel test 1.00 Relative effectc: 0.44 (0.26–0.61)
Duration of (S)-KET administration Brunner-Munzel test 1.00 Relative effect: 0.49 (0.31–0.68)
Latency from SE to (S)-KET Brunner-Munzel test 1.00 Relative effect: 0.54 (0.36–0.72)
Age Brunner-Munzel test 0.0014 Relative effect: 0.80 (0.66–0.94)

AED antiepileptic drug, CI confidence interval, SE status epilepticus, (S)-KET (S)-ketamine

aThe reported p values have been adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni-Holm correction

bThe reported odds ratio represents the quotient of the odds for dying given hypoxia = yes and the odds for dying given hypoxia = no. Analogous interpretations hold for the other odds ratios reported in the table

cThis quantity can be interpreted as an estimate of the probability that the value of the variable is lower for the alive than for the deceased