Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 8;12(9):1129–1139. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.16319

Table 3.

Rank of the candidate housekeeping genes of T. urticae under different experimental conditions.

Experimental condition Rank RefFinder ΔCt geNorm NormFinder BestKeeper
Gene GMa) Gene SDb) Gene Mc) Gene SVd) Gene re)
Acaricide resistance selection 1 CycA 1.86 CycA 0.27 Rp49/Rpl18 0.20 CycA 0.10 GAPDH 0.911
2 Rp49 2.56 GAPDH 0.28 - - GAPDH 0.15 CycA 0.894
3 GAPDH 2.63 Rp49 0.29 GAPDH 0.21 Rp49 0.19 Rp49 0.858
4 Rpl18 3.13 Rpl18 0.32 CycA 0.22 Rpl18 0.24 Actin 0.828
5 TUB 3.34 TUB 0.34 TUB 0.27 TUB 0.26 Rpl18 0.790
6 Ef1α 5.12 Actin 0.37 Actin 0.30 Actin 0.31 TUB 0.504
7 Actin 6.24 Ef1α 0.37 Ef1α 0.32 Ef1α 0.31 Ef1α 0.332
Host plant shift 1 GAPDH 2.00 GAPDH 0.82 Rp49/Rpl18 0.10 GAPDH 0.20 GAPDH 0.989
2 Rp49 2.06 CycA 0.87 - - CycA 0.44 Ef1α 0.980
3 Rpl18 2.63 Rp49 0.87 CycA 0.34 Rp49 0.62 CycA 0.973
4 CycA 2.78 Rpl18 0.88 GAPDH 0.42 Rpl18 0.65 TUB 0.963
5 Actin 4.30 TUB 1.16 TUB 0.75 TUB 0.93 Rp49 0.953
6 TUB 5.23 Ef1α 1.26 Ef1α 0.90 Ef1α 1.08 Rpl18 0.949
7 Ef1α 6.24 Actin 1.36 Actin 1.03 Actin 1.16 Actin 0.838
Both conditions 1 GAPDH 2.11 GAPDH 0.61 Rp49/Rpl18 0.21 GAPDH 0.22 GAPDH 0.987
2 Rp49 2.28 CycA 0.62 - - CycA 0.29 CycA 0.984
3 Rpl18 2.38 Rp49 0.64 CycA 0.31 Rp49 0.42 Ef1α 0.979
4 CycA 2.63 Rpl18 0.67 GAPDH 0.35 Rpl18 0.47 Rp49 0.973
5 Actin 4.30 TUB 0.82 TUB 0.56 TUB 0.63 Rpl18 0.969
6 TUB 5.23 Ef1α 0.92 Ef1α 0.67 Ef1α 0.79 TUB 0.967
7 Ef1α 6.24 Actin 1.00 Actin 0.76 Actin 0.86 Actin 0.901

a)GM: Geometric Mean; b) SD: Standard Deviation of comparative ΔCt; c) M: Average of expression stability values; d) SV: Stability Value; e) r: Pearson's correlation coefficient.