Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 25;7:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271

Table 3.

Multiple regression analyses of all predictors of T2 procedural justice for all study participants.

Predictors Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
B SE B β t B SE B β t B SE B β t
Age −0.01 0.02 −0.04 −0.77 −0.03 0.02 −0.07 −1.63 −0.03 0.02 −0.08 −1.84
Gender −0.11 0.28 −0.02 −0.36 −0.25 0.24 −0.04 −1.03 −0.21 0.25 −0.03 −0.86
Tenure 0.02 0.02 0.05 1.06 0.04 0.02 0.09 2.28* 0.04 0.02 0.09 2.30*
Staff group 0.35 0.28 0.05 1.27 0.31 0.26 0.05 1.19 0.34 0.27 0.05 1.28
T1 Work pressure 0.50 0.24 0.10 2.07* 0.47 0.24 0.09 1.96*
T1 Work-home Conflict 0.05 0.16 0.01 0.29 0.06 0.17 0.02 0.34
T1 Job security 0.05 −0.15 0.01 0.35 0.03 −0.15 0.01 0.20
T1 Autonomy −0.48 0.27 −0.08 −1.78 −0.49 0.27 −0.08 −1.82
T1 Job satisfaction 0.05 0.02 0.22 3.58*** 0.05 0.02 0.22 3.50**
T1 Org commitment −0.15 0.20 −0.03 −0.75 −0.20 0.20 −0.04 −0.97
T1 Trust in snr management 0.36 0.17 0.09 2.13* 0.36 0.17 0.09 2.14*
T1 Trust in supervisor 0.12 0.14 0.04 0.92 0.13 0.14 0.04 0.96
T1 Procedural justice 0.46 0.05 0.39 8.82*** 0.46 0.05 0.39 8.79***
T1 Negative affectivity −0.02 0.02 −0.04 −1.01
T1 Job involvement 0.10 0.20 .02 0.049
Adj. R2 −0.00
F 0.77
ΔR2 0.31
F change 28.98***
ΔR2 0.00
F change 0.59

N = 573.ΔR2 = change in R2.

*

p ≤ 0.05.

**

p ≤ 0.01.

***

p ≤ 0.001.