Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 25;7:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271

Table 4.

Multiple regression analyses of all predictors of T2 procedural justice for the academic staff category.

Predictors Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
B SE B β t B SE B β t B SE B β t
Age −0.03 0.03 −0.08 −1.01 −0.03 0.03 −0.06 −1.01 −0.06 0.03 −0.09 −1.32
Gender 0.32 0.42 0.05 0.76 −0.12 0.36 −0.02 −0.34 0.01 0.37 0.00 0.03
Tenure 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.72 0.04 0.03 0.09 1.31 0.04 0.03 0.09 1.40
T1 Work pressure 0.85 0.39 0.14 2.18* 0.76 0.39 0.13 1.94
T1 Work-home conflict −0.28 0.23 −0.07 −0.99 −0.30 0.25 −0.09 −1.16
T1 Job security 0.03 −0.21 0.01 0.15 0.01 −0.22 0.00 0.03
T1 Autonomy −0.14 0.41 −0.02 −0.35 −0.14 0.41 −0.02 −0.33
T1 Job satisfaction 0.05 0.02 0.22 2.37* 0.05 0.02 0.20 2.10*
T1 Organizational commitment 0.03 0.27 0.01 0.10 −0.10 0.28 −0.02 −0.36
T1 Trust in senior management −0.08 0.23 −0.02 −0.35 −0.05 0.23 −0.01 −0.21
T1 Trust in supervisor −0.02 0.19 −0.01 −0.10 0.02 0.20 0.01 0.12
T1 Procedural justice 0.55 0.08 0.45 6.51*** 0.54 0.08 0.45 6.44**
T1 Negative affectivity −0.02 0.02 −0.06 −0.98
T1 Job involvement 0.44 0.31 0.09 1.45
Adj. R2 −0.01
F 0.54
ΔR2 0.36
F change 14.92***
ΔR2 0.01
F change 1.43

N = 249. ΔR2 = change in R2.

*

p ≤ 0.05.

**

p ≤ 0.01.

***

p ≤ 0.001.