Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;8(8):450. doi: 10.3390/nu8080450

Table 3.

Associations between dietary patterns and age, body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage (BF%) in NZE women, aged 16–45 years (n = 231).

Patterns Age (Years) p-Value BMI (kg/m2) p-Value BF% p-Value
P1: Snacking
T1 31.9 ± 8.7 * 0.011 a 24.2 ± 3.7 31.9 ± 7.3
T2 29.9 ± 8.0 c 25.2 ± 4.8 32.1 ± 8.4
T3 33.9 ± 7.9 c 25.9 ± 6.5 33.7 ± 8.5
P2: Energy-dense meat 0.016 b
T1 32.8 ± 8.2 *,e 0.012 a 24.6 ± 4.2 *,e 32.2 ± 7.4 0.016 b
T2 32.9 ± 8.1 d 24.4 ± 4.0 d 31.4 ± 7.2
T3 30.0 ± 8.3 d,e 26.4 ± 6.7 d,e 34.3 ± 9.2
P3: Fruit and vegetable
T1 31.7 ± 7.8 24.8 ± 4.4 33.2 ± 7.2
T2 31.1 ± 8.4 24.4 ± 4.3 31.5 ± 7.2
T3 32.9 ± 8.6 26.2 ± 6.4 33.1 ± 9.5
P4: Healthy
T1 32.2 ± 8.6 25.2 ± 4.8 33.7 ± 7.5
T2 31.6 ± 8.6 25.5 ± 5.6 33.0 ± 8.1
T3 31.9 ± 7.6 24.8 ± 5.1 31.1 ± 8.4

Values are means ± standard deviations; T1, T2, T3 = tertiles of dietary pattern score; * p <0.05 following ANOVA analysis within each pattern, between tertiles; a = energy controlled for; b = age controlled for, c–e = values with the same superscript letters are significantly different according to both Tukey HSD and Gabriel post hoc tests.