Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 20;8(8):512. doi: 10.3390/nu8080512

Table 1.

Characteristics of the five studies that assessed the correlation of both body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WtHr) with body fat (BF) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors (Year) Design Simple Characteristics Age (Years) Mean %BF (SD) Fat Mass Assessment BMI or WtHr Results * Other Findings
R2 (95%CI) Beta Coefficient AUC
Barreira, T.V., et al. (2014) [27] Cross-sectional N = 382; 180 boys (84 African Americans (AA) & 96 Whites) and 202 girls (118 AA & 84 Whites). 5–18 Boys:
Whites: 24.0 (9.1)
AA: 24.0 (10.0)
Girls:
Whites: 31.1 (8.4)
AA: 31.8 (9.6)
Total fat mass (kg) BMI 0.91 (0.89–0.93) Significant linear relationship No significant interaction with race or sex.
WtHr 0.69 (0.64–0.74) Significant linear relationship Significant interaction race and sex.
Brambilla, P., et al. (2013) [28] Cross-sectional (US-NHANES 2003–2004) N= 2339; 1221 boys (326 Whites, 453 Blacks, 373 Mexicans, 69 other races) & 1118 girls (321 Whites, 387 Blacks, 348 Mexicans, 62 other races). 8–18 Whites: 29.0 (7.7)
Blacks: 26.0 (8.3)
Mexicans: 29.8 (7.7)
Others: 28.3 (7.8)
%BF BMI 0.32 (0.29–0.35) (unadjusted)
0.68 (age & sex)
0.70 (age, sex & race)
Found no practical advantage to add the ethnic group as further predictor in the model.
WtHr 0.64 (0.62–0.66) (unadjusted)
0.80 (age & sex)
0.80 (age, sex & race)
Karlsson, A.-K., et al. (2013) [25] Cross-sectional N = 100; 55 boys and 45 girls, moderately preterm at birth. 4.9–5.2 Boys: 17 (6)
Girls: 21 (6)
Total fat mass (kg) BMI 0.76 (0.66–0.83)
WtHr 0.55 (0.41–0.67)
De Miguel-Etayo, P., et al. (2015) ϕ [26] Longitudinal (EVASYON treatment program) [30] N = 83; 43 boys and 40 girls, overweight or obese [32] 13–16 Boys: 33.3 (31.5–35.1)
Girls: 39.9 (37.9–41.9)
Changes in FMI. Changes in BMI Boys: 0.77 (0.61–0.87)
Girls: 0.90 (0.82–0.95)
Boys: 0.68, Girls: 0.66 (unadjusted)
Boys: 0.68, Girls: 0.66 (age)
Boys: 0.68, Girls: 0.65 (age and Tanner)
Changes in WtHr Boys: 0.50 (0.27–0.70)
Girls: 0.49 (0.24–0.69)
Boys: 33.91, Girls: 19.04 (crude model)
Boys: 33.57, Girls: 18.37 (age)
Boys: 33.61, Girls: 18.53 (age and Tanner)
Tuan, N.T., et al. (2014) [29] Cross-sectional (US-NHANES 2001–2004) N= 5355; 2792 boys (796 Whites, 962 Blacks, 818 Mexicans, 216 other races) & 2563 girls (742 Whites, 809 Blacks, 809 Mexicans, 203 other races). 8–19 Boys:
Whites: 25.7 (0.5)
Blacks: 22.8 (0.2)
Mexican: 27.3 (0.3)
Girls:
Whites: 32.5 (0.4)
Blacks: 31.5 (0.3)
Mexican: 33.7 (0.3)
z-score of the %BF Obesity was defined as %BF by DEXA > 75th age & sex specific percentile (26%–33% in boys & 36%–38% in girls) [31]. z-score of the BMI Boys: 0.62 (0.60–0.64)
Girls: 0.67 (0.65-0.69)
Boys: 0.79
Girls: 0.82
(z-BMI)
(all races)
Boys: 0.91
Girls: 0.90
(all races)
Kappa +
Boys: 0.59
Girls: 0.60
(all races) Sex and ethnicity-race variations.
z-score of the WtHr Boys: 0.73 (0.71–0.75)
Girls: 0.70 (0.68–0.72)
Boys: 0.86
Girls: 0.84
(z-WtHr)
(all races)
Boys: 0.97
Girls: 0.94
(all races)
Kappa +
Boys: 0.71
Girls: 0.64
(all races) Sex and ethnicity-race variations.

* Adjusting factors appear in brackets; + Weighted Kappa for the agreement between quartiles; ϕ This study reported Pseudo-R2 instead of R2; and %BF was reported as median (interquartile range); SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; BMI: body mass index; WtHr: waist-to-height ratio; R2: coefficient of determination; AUC: Area under the curve; DEXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; %BF: body fat percentage; FMI: Fat mass index; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.