Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 10;13(8):806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080806

Table 3.

Summary ORs and heterogeneity results for associations between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and DR.

Subgroup Genetic Model Studies No (All/Sensitivity) OR (95% CI) p * I2 (%) OR se (95% CI) #
Overall CT vs. CC 18/15 1.46 (1.15–1.86) 0.00 60.0 1.32 (1.02–1.70)
TT vs. CC 18/15 2.45 (1.66–3.60) 0.00 69.0 2.27 (1.44–3.58)
Allele contrast 18/15 1.52 (1.26–1.84) 0.00 72.4 1.45 (1.17–1.79)
Recessive model 18/15 1.67 (1.19–2.40) 0.00 71.9 1.87 (1.32–2.66)
Dominant model 18/15 1.71 (1.28–2.28) 0.00 75.3 1.50 (1.13–1.98)
Asian CT vs. CC 12/9 1.71 (1.22–2.39) 0.00 64.9 1.52 (1.01–2.30)
TT vs. CC 12/9 2.97 (2.06–4.29) 0.02 51.5 3.07 (1.83–5.14)
Allele contrast 12/9 1.75 (1.42–2.18) 0.00 67.3 1.69 (1.28–2.24)
Recessive model 12/9 2.16 (1.75–2.65) 0.11 35.1 2.34(1.62–3.38)
Dominant model 12/9 1.98 (1.42–2.76) 0.00 68.6 1.83 (1.20–2.81)
Non-Asian CT vs. CC 6/6 1.15 (0.92–1.45) 0.38 5.4 1.15 (0.92–1.45)
TT vs. CC 6/6 1.33 (0.69–2.54) 0.04 61.4 1.33 (0.69–2.54)
Allele contrast 6/6 1.14 (0.89–1.46) 0.07 51.5 1.14 (0.89–1.46)
Recessive model 6/6 1.24 (0.69–2.23) 0.05 57.7 1.24 (0.69–2.23)
Dominant model 6/6 1.18 (0.95–1.47) 0.21 30.70 1.18 (0.95–1.47)
T2DM CT vs. CC 12/10 1.50 (1.08–2.09) 0.00 66.5 1.32 (0.93–1.86)
TT vs. CC 12/10 2.68 (1.74–4.13) 0.00 66.2 2.61 (1.50–4.53)
Allele contrast 12/10 1.59 (1.26–2.01) 0.00 74.0 1.49 (1.14–1.96)
Recessive model 12/10 2.05 (1.47–2.84) 0.01 56.9 2.10 (1.38–3.17)
Dominant model 12/10 1.72 (1.23–2.42) 0.00 72.1 1.54 (1.06–2.24)
Non-T2DM CT vs. CC 6/5 1.30 (1.02–1.66) 0.12 43.5 1.32 (0.89–1.97)
TT vs. CC 6/5 1.75 (0.93–3.27) 0.05 55.9 1.70 (0.80–3.63)
Allele contrast 6/5 1.38 (1.02–1.88) 0.02 64.5 1.34 (0.95–1.91)
Recessive model 6/5 1.38 (0.96–2.00) 0.14 39.5 1.32 (0.89–1.97)
Dominant model 6/5 1.46 (1.00–2.13) 0.04 57.4 1.42 (0.92–2.19)
Asian with T2DM CT vs. CC 9/7 1.64 (1.07–2.50) 0.00 73.8 1.40 (0.86–2.29)
TT vs. CC 9/7 3.00 (1.92–4.68) 0.01 63.8 2.99 (1.63–5.50)
Allele contrast 9/7 1.73 (1.33–2.26) 0.00 76.0 1.64 (1.17–2.29)
Recessive model 9/7 2.21 (1.59–3.06) 0.03 51.9 2.33 (1.52–3.57)
Dominant model 9/7 1.94 (1.27–2.94) 0.00 76.7 1.72 (1.03–2.89)
Asian with Non-T2DM CT vs. CC 3/2 1.99 (1.22–3.25) 0.87 0.0 2.19 (1.19–4.01)
TT vs. CC 3/2 2.80 (1.39–5.66) 0.77 0.0 3.50 (1.28–9.62)
Allele contrast 3/2 1.86 (1.32–2.60) 0.90 0.0 1.97 (1.28–3.05)
Recessive model 3/2 2.06 (1.06–4.02) 0.87 0.0 2.38 (0.91–6.24)
Dominant model 3/2 2.17 (1.38–3.42) 0.85 0.0 2.40 (1.35–4.28)
Non-Asian with T2DM CT vs. CC 3/3 1.20 (0.81–1.76) 0.79 0.0 1.20 (0.81–1.76)
TT vs. CC 3/3 1.54 (0.43–5.46) 0.08 68.2 1.54 (0.43–5.46)
Allele contrast 3/3 1.18 (0.90–1.56) 0.25 27.0 1.18 (0.90–1.56)
Recessive model 3/3 1.37 (0.39–4.82) 0.06 70.8 1.37 (0.39–4.82)
Dominant model 3/3 1.24 (0.86–1.80) 0.58 0.0 1.24 (0.86–1.80)
Non-Asian with Non-T2DM CT vs. CC 3/3 1.09 (0.69–1.71) 0.09 58.0 1.09 (0.69–1.71)
TT vs. CC 3/3 1.24 (0.49–3.14) 0.03 71.9 1.24 (0.49–3.14)
Allele contrast 3/3 1.13 (0.76–1.68) 0.02 73.3 1.13 (0.76–1.68)
Recessive model 3/3 1.21 (0.54–2.72) 0.05 66.9 1.21 (0.54–2.72)
Dominant model 3/3 1.13 (0.69–1.83) 0.05 66.7 1.13 (0.69–1.83)

# OR se: Sensitivity analysis OR for HWE; * Test for heterogeneity: random-effects model was used when p value for heterogeneity test <0.05 and I2 > 50%; otherwise, fixed-effects model was used; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus;Non-T2DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus or unknown DM type or mixed DM type; Non-Asian, Caucasian and African-American population.