Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 11;8(8):225. doi: 10.3390/v8080225

Table 1.

Mean ± SE number of whiteflies* landing on (a) Tomato chlorosis virus (ToSRV)-infected and (b) Tomato severe rugose virus (ToCV)-infected tomato leaves, mock-inoculated tomato leaves, and brown background (blank) 6 h after release from the launch platform. Plexiglass sheets containing a coating of mineral oil were placed on top of the leaves to provide a uniform landing surface (65 × 65 cm) and avoid the confounding effects of leaf olfactory cues. Each assay was repeated four times.

(a)
Treatment Non-Viruliferous (n = 48) Viruliferous (n = 48)
ToSRV-infected 8.85 ± 1.34 a 8.98 ± 1.29 a
Mock-inoculated 4.17 ± 0.76 b 3.29 ± 0.44 b
Blank 1.71 ± 0.40 c 1.67 ± 0.24 c
df 2141 2141
F 40.087 37.910
P <0.0001 <0.0001
(b)
ToCV-infected 8.35 ± 0.97 a 7.48 ± 0.74 a
Mock-inoculated 5.85 ± 0.68 b 5.65 ± 0.86 b
Blank 2.15 ± 0.32 c 4.81 ± 0.88 b
df 2141 2141
F 27.237 5.791
P <0.0001 0.0038

* Mean values represent the number of whiteflies landing per target (11 × 11 cm). Means followed by the same letter within columns indicate no significant (p > 0.05) differences between treatments according to an ANOVA followed by a Fisher Protected LSD test. Data was transformed by ln(x+1) before analysis. Infection status of viruliferous whiteflies was verified by PCR as described in Section 2.1.