Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 25;8(16):558–567. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i16.558

Table 3.

Comparison of the invasion depth diagnosis between endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoscopy

Clinical diagnosis Histologic diagnosis
EUS diagnosis
P2 Histologic diagnosis
Accuracy P (vs EUS)
M/SM1 SM2 Overall accuracy Accuracy1 M/SM1 SM2
Diagnosis M/SM1 81 9 71.2 82.6 97 18 79.7 0.54
SM2 14 28 13 25
Macroscopic type 0.30
I M/SM1 - - - - 5 1 88.9 -
SM2 - - 0 3
IIa/IIb M/SM1 26 4 67.3 77.8 32 5 78.8 0.90
SM2 6 9 6 9
IIc M/SM1 55 5 80.4 85.1 60 12 79.3 0.32
SM2 8 19 7 13
Location 0.55
Upper M/SM1 21 2 74.4 80 24 4 80.0 > 0.99
SM2 6 11 5 12
Middle M/SM1 40 7 69.9 78.5 44 11 78.3 0.98
SM2 7 11 4 10
Lower M/SM1 19 2 62.2 85.2 29 3 82.1 > 0.99
SM2 2 4 4 3
Histology 0.79
Diff. M/SM1 71 10 70.4 83 77 12 80.5 0.63
SM2 8 17 11 18
Undiff. M/SM1 9 1 75.0 84 20 6 77.1 > 0.99
SM2 4 12 2 7
Ulcer scar < 0.0001
Positive M/SM1 3 2 46.7 50 7 4 58.6 0.51
SM2 12 11 8 10
Negative M/SM1 77 7 75.6 89.4 90 14 84.7 0.29
SM2 4 16 5 15
Indication for ER < 0.0001
Absolute M/SM1 37 - 80.4 97.4b 43 - 84.3f 0.07
SM2 1 - 8 -
Expanded M/SM1 28 - 75.7 87.5d 33 - 86.8h > 0.99
SM2 4 - 5 -
Non-indication M/SM1 12 13 56.1 62.7bd 16 18 64.1fh > 0.99
SM2 9 25 5 25

Accuracy1 was calculated with the exception of 21 inconclusive cases of EUS; P2 indicates a significant difference in Accuracy1.

b

P < 0.0001;

d

P = 0.02;

f

P = 0.02;

h

P = 0.01. EUS: Endoscopic ultrasonography; CE: conventional endoscopy; Diff: Differentiated-type; Undiff: Undifferentiated-type; ER: Endoscopic resection.