TABLE 5.
Variablec | β | P | OR (95% CI)a |
---|---|---|---|
PZA monoresistance vs DS | |||
Previously treated | 1.052 | 0.005b | 2.86 (1.363–6.015) |
Beijing family | 1.186 | 0.109 | 3.28 (0.766–14.00) |
PZA resistance/MDR vs DS | |||
Age | 0.022 | 0.024b | 1.02 (1.003–1.042) |
Previously treated | 1.867 | <0.001b | 6.47 (3.186–13.15) |
Cavity | 0.972 | 0.008b | 2.64 (1.296–5.391) |
Beijing family | 1.849 | 0.074 | 6.35 (0.838–48.14) |
PZA resistance vs DS | |||
Age | 0.013 | 0.012b | 1.01 (1.003–1.023) |
Previously treated | 1.193 | <0.001b | 3.30 (2.131–5.101) |
Beijing family | 0.812 | 0.019b | 2.25 (1.140–4.451) |
OR and 95% CI were calculated in the binary logistic regression model by backward selection.
P < 0.05.
DS, first-line drug susceptible; MDR, multidrug resistant; PZA, pyrazinamide.