Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;184:780–791. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.077

Table 2.

Chemical and physical properties of the different biomass feedstock.

Samples Bulk density kg/m3 Particle sizeb (mm) Proximate analysis (wt.% dry basis)
Ultimate analysis (wt.% dry basis)
HHV (MJ/kg)
Volatile matter Fixed carbon Ash content C H N Oa
WB 600 ± 18 8 × 10 98.70 ± 0.00 0.22 ± 0.00 1.04 ± 0.00 48.96 ± 0.80 6.88 ± 0.11 0.08 ± 0.00 43.04 ± 0.90 21.54 ± 0.38
SF 626 ± 5 5 × 10 86.77 ± 0.00 0.08 ± 0.00 13.15 ± 0.00 44.85 ± 0.10 7.24 ± 0.03 2.52 ± 0.01 32.24 ± 0.10 22.36 ± 0.06
HF 277 ± 45 10 × 10 85.39 ± 0.00 0.05 ± 0.00 14.56 ± 0.00 49.41 ± 0.11 7.62 ± 0.04 5.31 ± 0.02 23.10 ± 0.16 24.73 ± 0.10

HF – Human Faeces, WB – Wood Biomass, SF – Simulant Faeces; Oxygen.

a

100 – (wt.% of C, H, N and ash).

b

Average size reported.