Table 2.
Models explaining mite and mildew variables according to AICc selection for V. riparia manipulations
| Rank | Intercept | Leaf length | Foliar sugar | Leaf length × Foliar sugar | d.f. | logLik | AICc | ΔAICc | AICw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mite abundance pre-inoculation | |||||||||
| 1 | 3·92 | –0·05 | + | + | 4 | –131·38 | 273·43 | 0·00 | 1·00 |
| 2 | 3·33 | + | 2 | –141·54 | 287·78 | 14·35 | 0·00 | ||
| 3 | 3·19 | 0·01 | + | 3 | –141·16 | 289·82 | 16·38 | 0·00 | |
| 4 | 3·21 | 0·03 | 2 | –157·08 | 318·87 | 45·44 | 0·00 | ||
| 5 | 3·58 | 1 | –159·97 | 322·17 | 48·74 | 0·00 | |||
| Mite abundance post-inoculation | |||||||||
| 1 | 1·39 | 0·12 | + | + | 4 | –72·35 | 155·56 | 0·00 | 0·99 |
| 2 | 2·11 | 0·06 | + | 3 | –78·61 | 164·83 | 9·27 | 0·01 | |
| 3 | 2·24 | 0·07 | 2 | –88·50 | 181·75 | 26·19 | 0·00 | ||
| 4 | 2·83 | + | 2 | –88·61 | 181·98 | 26·42 | 0·00 | ||
| 5 | 3·14 | 1 | –103·11 | 208·46 | 52·90 | 0·00 | |||
The ‘delta’ column shows the difference between a model’s AICc and that of the highest ranked model (rank =1). The best fitting models (ΔAICc >2) are in bold. Model coefficients are shown for leaf length, and plus signs are shown for factor variables.