Table 2.
Method | () | () | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.47 | ||
AASM | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.76 |
Note that indicates the absolute difference between the area derived from the manual label and the estimated segmentation, represents the Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and is the R-square value of a linear regression. The subscripts , and represent subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, and the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat, respectively.