Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: Online J Nurs Inform. 2015 Nov 1;19:http://www.himss.org/impact-heath-information-technology-quality-patient-care.

Table 3.

Effects of EHR Adoption Stage on Patient Satisfaction (N = 41)

Unadjusted Adjusted
Outcome Variable β R2 F β R2 F
MD communicates well   0.00 0.00 0.00 −0.04 0.12 2.64
RN communicates well   0.10 0.01 0.46 −0.03 0.45 9.97
Receive help quickly   0.02 0.00 0.03 −0.08 0.29 4.95
Pain well controlled   0.07 0.00 0.22   0.00 0.15 3.11
Medications explained −0.03 0.00 0.05 −0.08 0.10 2.23
Environment clean −0.18 0.03 1.38
Environment quiet   0.14 0.02 0.80   0.12 0.15 3.32
Given discharge information −0.26 0.06 2.74 −0.31* 0.46 7.56
High rating for hospital (9–10)   0.00 0.00 0.00 −0.08 0.39 5.77
Definitely recommend hospital −0.02 0.00 0.02 −0.10 0.47 8.15
*

p < .05

Note. All responses are “top box” or response of “always” or highest possible rating. Adjusted models included indicated control variables: nurse staffing levels, certification, education; patient comorbidities, age, race, gender and insurance status; and hospital geographic location, size (beds), high technology status and teaching status.