Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;4(16):e12895. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12895

Table 2.

Subject characteristics

Variable LHC T2DM
n 18 (7 ♂) 9 (5 ♂)
Age, year 31 ± 2 58 ± 4a
Weight, kg 62.8 ± 2.8 104.7 ± 7.7a
BMI, kg/m2 22.3 ± 0.6 34.1 ± 2.1a
Body fat, % 25.3 ± 1.4 40.2 ± 2.8a
Systolic BP, mmHg 116 ± 4 135 ± 6a
Diastolic BP, mmHg 69 ± 3 79 ± 4
FPG, mg/dL 91 ± 1 127 ± 12a
FPI, μU/mL 8.4 ± 1.4 8.0 ± 1.0
HbA1c, % 5.4 ± 0.1 7.2 ± 0.6a
2 h‐OGTT, mg/dL 101 ± 3 233 ± 39a
GDR, mg/kg/min 6.6 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.3a
Clamp Insulin, μU/mL 91.0 ± 10.2 89.2 ± 6.0
Total chol, mg/dL 156 ± 6 152 ± 10
HDL, mg/dL 63 ± 4 53 ± 5
LDL, mg/dL 79 ± 7 79 ± 7
VLDL, mg/dL 15 ± 1 21 ± 5
TG, mg/dL 74 ± 6 104 ± 26

Data represent mean ± SEM. a.u., arbitrary units; BMI, body mass index; chol, cholesterol; fat%, percentage of body fat; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FPI, fasting plasma insulin; GDR; hyperinsulinemic‐euglycemic clamp‐derived glucose disposal rate; clamp insulin, steady‐state plasma insulin concentrations at end of clamp; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; LHC, lean healthy control; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; TG, triglycerides.

a

Significant difference between LHC and T2DM (P < 0.05).