Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 3):66–74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_9

Table 2.

Average confusion matrices for six types of features over 10 iterations of 3-fold cross-validation for a codebook of size 40 clusters. Each row shows the true class labels and columns show predicted labels. Each row sums to the total number of images in that subtype.

(a) No Inv.
CC CH ON PA
CC 19.5 8.1 0.9 0.5
CH 10.0 18.2 2.9 0.9
ON 1.8 5.9 8.5 0.8
PA 1.5 1.2 1.5 23.8
(b) No Inv. (dense)
CC CH ON PA
CC 18.3 8.6 1.6 0.5
CH 8.4 18.9 3.0 1.7
ON 3.3 2.5 9.3 1.9
PA 3.6 3.2 2.8 18.4
(c) Scale Inv.
CC CH ON PA
CC 19.5 8.4 1.1 0.0
CH 8.6 19.2 3.0 1.2
ON 2.0 4.4 9.6 1.0
PA 1.3 1.0 1.9 23.8
(d) Rot Inv.
CC CH ON PA
CC 25.0 2.9 0.7 0.4
CH 5.5 25.4 1.1 0.0
ON 1.7 2.9 11.0 1.4
PA 0.7 0.1 1.8 25.4
(e) Rot. Inv. (dense)
CC CH ON PA
CC 25.7 1.9 1.0 0.4
CH 4.3 25.6 1.7 0.4
ON 1.4 3.0 11.4 1.2
PA 1.1 0.7 2.5 23.7
(f) Scale & Rot. Inv.
CC CH ON PA
CC 25.3 3.3 0.1 0.3
CH 3.5 25.9 2.1 0.5
ON 0.8 1.8 13.8 0.6
PA 1.4 0.3 1.3 25.0