Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;113(34):9492–9497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603632113

Table 2.

Examples of directional selection estimated between sub-Saharan African and non–sub-Saharan African groups: differences in trait means between groups, estimated selection gradients (β), net response to selection (∆ z¯), and correlated responses to selection on traits that combine to yield the net response (∆zelement)

graphic file with name pnas.1603632113t01.jpg

Within the trait-specific responses to selection matrix, direct responses to selection are shaded, and indirect (correlated) responses are not. Bold text indicates estimated selection gradients with 95% CIs that do not overlap with zero. All pairwise comparisons between sub-Saharan African and non–sub-Saharan African groups are presented in SI Appendix, Tables S1a–S1nn.