Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2016 Aug 17;91(4):878–892. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.034

Figure 2. Individual mice exhibited non-stochastic variability in VSN functional types.

Figure 2

(A) Cell counts of each VSN functional type in each imaging volume.

(B) Cell count variability (see Experimental Procedures) of each type in all imaging volumes. Green represents the 95% confidence interval if cell numbers are drawn from a multinomial distribution.

(C) Variability was not correlated with cell abundance, r: Pearson’s correlation coefficient (p=0.14).

(D) Pairs of imaging volumes recorded from the same animals. Each color represents one animal, and the two lines with the same color are the two non-overlapping imaging volumes from the same animal.

(E) Left (by cell type): summed difference of intra-animal pairs (●) was smaller than that of any combination of inter-animal pairs (●, all 265 possible permutations of pairs in E are shown). Right (by total cell #): intra-animal difference (●) is not significantly smaller than all possible inter-animal differences ●.

Error bars represent 95% confidence interval.

See also Figure S2.