Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Care Forum. 2016 Apr 5;45(5):745–758. doi: 10.1007/s10566-016-9356-z

Table 2.

Child, Parent, and Therapist Characteristics Associated with Observed PPE Controlling for Study Condition

B ΔR 2 R 2 p value f 2
Child-level
    Age 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.76 0.04
    First time MH service use –0.41 0.14 0.17 0.25 0.20*
    ECBI intensity 0.004 0.11 0.14 0.33 0.16*
Parent-level
    Ethnicity (Hispanic) –0.58 0.34 0.37 0.03 0.59*
    Education (high school/GED vs. more than high school/GED) 0.16 0.03 0.05 0.52 0.05
    PHQ 8 –0.001 0.00 0.03 0.81 0.03
    PMI desire for change <0.001 0.00 0.00 0.82 <0.001
    PMI readiness to change 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.63 0.06
    PMI ability to change 0.10 0.19 0.22 0.16 0.28*
Therapist-level
    Training in parent-mediated interventions 0.42 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.23*
    TACK values –0.43 0.10 0.12 0.38 0.14
    TCU efficacy 0.05 0.17 0.20 0.19 0.25*
    TCU influence 0.18 0.03 0.06 0.64 0.06

A separate model was performed for each child, parent and therapist characteristic with study condition included as the sole covariate; B coefficients reported are unstandardized; f2 ≥ 0.02, f2 ≥ 0.15, and f2 ≥ 0.35 represent small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively (Cohen 1988)

*

An effect size of medium to large magnitude; bolded and underlined p values are less than 0.05