Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 30;6:32193. doi: 10.1038/srep32193

Table 2. Comparison of median decoding error (mean ± SEM, n = 50 Monte Carlo runs) between DecodewRF and DecodewoRF for Dataset 1.

T0 (bpe) DecodewRF
DecodewoRF
ρ = 0.3 ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 ρ = 0.3 ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8
10 13.97 ± 0.07 10.49 ± 0.06 7.78 ± 0.02 12.56 ± 0.07 11.37 ± 0.06 10.61 ± 0.05
20 15.35 ± 0.12 11.03 ± 0.04 7.80 ± 0.01 12.39 ± 0.05 10.65 ± 0.04 9.71 ± 0.04
50 14.40 ± 0.08 10.87 ± 0.06 7.88 ± 0.02 11.15 ± 0.05 9.78 ± 0.05 8.51 ± 0.03
100 14.50 ± 0.09 10.78 ± 0.05 7.93 ± 0.02 11.49 ± 0.05 10.04 ± 0.04 8.84 ± 0.04
100* 15.97 ± 0.18 10.78 ± 0.09 7.93 ± 0.04 12.53 ± 0.16 11.51 ± 0.12 9.07 ± 0.18
  Δ = 50 ms Δ = 150 ms Δ = 250 ms Δ = 50 ms Δ = 150 ms Δ = 250 ms
10 14.53 ± 0 8.58 ± 0 7.01 ± 0 16.21 ± 1.23 11.12 ± 0.32 10.52 ± 0.16
20 14.53 ± 0 8.58 ± 0 7.01 ± 0 16.35 ± 1.68 12.10 ± 0.31 10.02 ± 0.15
50 14.53 ± 0 8.58 ± 0 7.01 ± 0 16.68 ± 1.20 12.47 ± 0.32 10.17 ± 0.19
100 14.53 ± 0 8.58 ± 0 7.01 ± 0 15.40 ± 1.19 10.90 ± 0.34 8.38 ± 0.19

When varying ρ, we fixed Δ = 250 ms; when varying Δ, we fixed ρ = 1. Except for T0 = 100* bpe, the same active cells were used in each epoch.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure