Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 14;5(9):782–794. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.06.003

Table 2.

Human studies investigating microbiota involvement in the development of NAFLD and NASH.

Study Technique Groups Samples Main findings
NAFLD Michail et al., 2015 [52] 16s rRNA Microarray microbial community profiling 13 obese children with NAFLD
11 obese children without NAFLD
26 healthy children
Stool Obese children with NAFLD:
↑ Gammaproteobacteria
↑ Epsilonproteobacteria
↑ Prevotella
Spencer et al., 2011 [53] 16s rRNA V1–V2 region sequence analysis 15 individuals:
10 days normal diet (baseline), then 42 days choline-depleted diet. Back to 10 days normal diet
Multiple stool samples from multiple time points Baseline samples:
↑ Gammaproteobacter at baseline correlates to lower risk of developing fatty liver on low-choline diet.
↑ Erysipelotrichia at baseline correlates to higher risk of developing fatty liver on low-choline diet.
Raman et al., 2013 [55] 16s rRNA V1–V2 region sequence analysis 30 obese NAFLD patients
30 healthy controls
stool Obese NAFLD versus healthy controls:
↑ Lactobacillus
↓ Firmicutes
↓ Oscillibacteria
NASH Zhu et al., 2013 [56] 16s rRNA V4–V5 region sequence analysis 22 NASH children
25 obese children
16 healthy controls
stool Obese and NASH versus Healthy controls:
↑ Bacteroidetes
↑ Prevotella
NASH versus obese and healthy controls
↑ Proteobacter
↑ Enterobacteriaceae
↑ Escherichia
Wong et al., 2013 [136] 16s rRNA V1–V2 region sequence analysis 16 NASH patients
22 Healthy controls
stool NASH versus healthy controls:
↓ Firmicutes
No Change – Bacteroidetes
↑ Parabacteroides
↑ Allisonella
↓ Faecalibacterium
↓ Anaerosporobacter
Boursier et al., 2016 [59] 16s rRNA V4 region sequence analysis 22 NAFLD patients
35 NASH patients
stool NASH versus NAFLD:
↑ Bacteroidetes