Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2016 May 7;61:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.007

Table 2.

Results of Path Model (N=264) Predicting Drinking to Cope and HED.

Predictor Follow up Drinking to Cope Follow up Heavy Episodic Drinking
B SE R squared (.1=small, .3=medium, .5=large) B SE R squared (.1=small, .3=medium, .5=large)
Dummy Code 1: Comparing Assessment group to Alcohol-Only group .064 .066 .004 −.073 .058 .005
Dummy Code 2: Comparing Assessment group to Sexual Assault-Only group .171 .100 .029 −.005 .064 .000
Dummy Code 3: Comparing Assessment group to Combined group −.025 .061 .006 −.045 .064 .002
Baseline Heavy Episodic Drinking .018 .071 .000 .517*** .059 .267
Baseline Drinking to Cope .749*** .109 .561 -- --
Severity of Adult Sexual Assault .029 .066 .001 -- --
Age −.051 .058 .003 -- --
Sorority .041 .070 .002 -- --
Readiness to Change −.037 .050 .001 -- --
History of Child Abuse .020 .091 .000 -- --
D1 × Baseline Cope −.014 .085 .000 -- --
D2 × Baseline Cope −.136 .097 .018 -- --
D3 × Baseline Cope −.190* .087 .036 -- --
Follow Up Drinking to Cope -- -- -- .184** .053 .039

Note.

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001. B =Standardized regression coefficient. SE= Standard error.