Table 2.
Rank | Target protein | Patch-Surfer Score a) | Binding or not |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DIG5 | 0.592 | Yes (205μM) |
2 | DIG8 | 0.653 | No |
3 | DIG19 | 0.684 | Yes (541 pM) |
4 | DIG10 | 0.686 | Yes (8.9 μM) |
5 | DIG18 | 0.688 | Yes b) |
6 | DIG9 | 0.702 | No |
7 | DIG2 | 0.711 | No |
8 | DIG3 | 0.723 | No |
9 | DIG13 | 0.724 | No |
10 | DIG6 | 0.729 | No |
11 | DIG7 | 0.752 | No |
12 | DIG4 | 0.785 | No |
13 | DIG12 | 0.789 | No |
14 | DIG17 | 0.802 | No |
15 | DIG14 | 0.847 | No |
16 | DIG1 | 0.963 | No |
Eight targets in bold (DIG5 to DIG3 in the table) were predicted to bind the target ligand.
A small Patch-Surfer score indicates that the putative binding pocket is similar to the reference steroid binding pocket.
The binding affinity of this protein is not available because it was not reported in the paper by Tinberg et al. 29.