Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;2(2):00097-2015. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00097-2015

TABLE 3.

Sensitivity analysis

Study and year of publication Weight SMD (95% CI) I2 p-value
Dubiley and Shogentsukova, 1973 [18]
(three groups combined)
12.53 0.35 (0.25–0.46) 64 <0.001
Kolesaret al., 1977 [19] 1.77 0.53 (0.43–0.63) 85 <0.001
Boneret al., 1985 [20] 1.41 0.52 (0.42–0.62) 85 <0.001
Bobokhodzhaev and Shirinskii, 1990 [21]
(two groups combined)
4.75 0.51 (0.41–0.61) 86 <0.001
Brimkulov, 1991 (2) [22]
(two groups combined)
14.19 0.48 (0.38–0.59) 84 <0.001
Piacentiniet al., 1993 [23] 2.40 0.54 (0.44–0.64) 85 <0.001
Simonet al., 1994 [24] 1.59 0.53 (0.43–0.62) 85 <0.001
Allegraet al., 1995 [11] 1.32 0.53 (0.44–0.63) 85 <0.001
Boneret al., 1995 [25]
(two groups combined)
2.23 0.53 (0.43–0.62) 86 <0.001
van Velzenet al., 1996 [12] 1.91 0.53 (0.44–0.63) 85 <0.001
Kokov, 1996 [26] 8.06 0.55 (0.45–0.65) 85 <0.001
Vallettaet al., 1997 [27] 1.67 0.53 (0.44–0.63) 85 <0.001
Grootendorstet al., 2001 [28] 2.09 0.53 (0.43–0.63) 85 <0.001
Peroniet al., 2002 [29] 2.16 0.54 (0.44–0.64) 85 <0.001
Straubet al., 2004 [30] 5.76 0.55 (0.46–0.65) 85 <0.001
Louie and Pare, 2004 [31] 0.40 0.54 (0.44–0.63) 85 <0.001
Peroniet al., 2009 [32] 2.64 0.54 (0.44–0.64) 85 <0.001
Huismanset al., 2010 [33] 2.83 0.56 (0.46–0.65) 84 <0.001
Rijssenbeek-Nouwenset al., 2012 [34]
(two groups combined)
16.32 0.58 (0.47–0.68) 85 <0.001
Seyset al., 2013 [35] 2.07 0.53 (0.43–0.62) 85 <0.001
Verkleijet al., 2013 [14]
(two groups combined)
11.90 0.60 (0.49–0.70) 85 <0.001

Data are presented as % or n unless otherwise stated. SMD: standardised mean difference.