. 2016 Mar 29;4(3):e182–e189. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2016.02.004

Table 4.

Summary of 12 hierarchical multiple regression models with EDI, BESAA appearance and attribution, and BISC as predictors and desire, arousal, and orgasm as dependent variables^∗

Predictor	Desire					Arousal					Orgasm
R² change	B	SE	β	R²	R² change	B	SE	β	R²	R² change	B	SE	β	R²
EDI body dissatisfaction subscale	0.06^†	−0.05	0.02	−0.31^†	0.17	0.08^‡	−0.04	0.02	−0.35^‡	0.11	0.04	−0.06	0.03	−0.24	0.13
BESAA appearance subscale	0.02	0.22	0.16	0.17^†	0.11	0.05^†	0.24	0.11	0.26^†	0.7	0.02	0.32	0.24	0.16	0.9
BESAA attribution subscale	0.04^†	0.35	0.18	0.22^†	0.14	0.11^‡	0.39	0.12	0.35^‡	0.13	0.02	0.34	0.28	0.14	0.9
BISC	0.04	−0.01	0.01	−0.19	0.13	0.13^‡	−0.02	0.01	−0.37^‡	0.15	0.06^†	−0.03	0.01	−0.25^†	0.14

BESAA = Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults; BISC = Body Image Consciousness Scale; EDI = Eating Disorders Inventory.

^∗

For each hierarchical multiple regression model, relationship satisfaction, relationship length, and percentage of total fat were entered at step 1 as control variables. Then, the predictor of interest was entered in step 2. In total, 12 multiple regression models were examined, one for each predictor.

^†

P < .05; ^‡P < .01.