Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 11;4(2):e75–e84. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2015.12.001

Table 1.

Characteristics and comparison of surgical outcomes of patients undergoing PIG using the iGrafter technique

Patient Age (year) Deviation (degrees) Hourglass IIEF-5 pre-op IIEF-5 post-op Graft area (cm2) Graft number Ossification Length gain— shortest side (cm) Follow up (months) Surgical outcome Treatment
1 63 60-L x 23 25 8 2 x 2 26 Straight
2 62 50-D 33-L x 19 21 11.7 2 3 26 Straight
3 47 45-D 22 23 7.5 2 2 26 After 4 mo bend 46° D New graft surgery
4 49 63-D 12 10 16.6 2 x 4 26 Straight PDE5i
5 54 120-D x 24 19 23 4 6 22 After 12 mo bend 38° L
6 37 38-R 23 21 7.5 2 2 22 Straight
7 55 50-L x 22 22 13.8 2 3 13 Straight
8 50 36-D x 16 10 13.3 2 2 11 Corpora cavernosa severe fibrosis + ED ICI of alprostadil 10 μg
9 31 51-D x 24 24 10 2 3 6 After 3 mo hourglass
Mean 48 57 20.6 19.4 12.4 2.2 3 17.8

D = dorsal; L = left; R = right; ICI = intracavernous injection; PDE5i = phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor; ED = erectile dysfunction; mo = month; IIEF = International Index of Erectile Function; PIG = plaque incision and graft.