Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;7:1211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01211

Table 2.

Frequency of effort-shape observations by each participant in the two case studies according to the particular analysis task performed by observer participants.

Case study Case Study 1 Case Study 2
Task Verification task Independent analysis task Signal-detection yes/no task Independent analysis task
Observer Percussionists Violinist French hornist “verified” (correct identification) French hornist “non-verified” (“catch trial”) Percussionist Vocalist
Basic effort actions “Punch” 34 10 34 33 0 0
“Dab” 40 12 37 36 18 14
“Float” 17 4 13 16 17 0
“Glide” 7 8 6 6 1 13
“Press” 6 0 6 3 0 0
“Flick” 1 5 1 1 13 0
“Slash” 0 0 0 0 0 0
“Wring” 0 0 0 0 0 0
Transformation drives “Passion” 11 4 11 6 0 0
“Vision” 17 4 15 16 0 0
“Spell” 5 11 4 3 3 0
Shape features “Rising” 67 46 55 20 4 38
“Sinking” 77 30 64 40 0 14
“Widening” 25 37 20 19 2 0
“Narrowing” 0 11 0 0 0 0
“Advancing” 2 4 2 1 0 0
“Retreating” 5 2 5 1 1 0